Friends, I came across a book published in 1959, and thought I would share its preface with you. The book– AN INTRODUCTION TO THE GREAT BOOKS AND TO A LIBERAL EDUCATION: THE GREAT IDEAS PROGRAM. As a young mother, I saw this program move into schools as enrichment for gifted children. I feel that this was lamentable. Why? I feel that most citizens can benefit from this kind of education. Why just children and why just gifted children? I feel Hutchins’ message is just as true today, as then, when he was President of the University of Chicago. This message is so important! Especially, as we look to solve the dilemmas that face us in education. He lived through WWII and saw what happens when you have a highly specialized society that lacked a truly liberal education, as did pre WWII Germany.
We can best help our society by getting a liberal education, ourselves, and helping our children to do so. I am hopeful and optimistic that if we really follow the counsel of President Gordon B. Hinckley and get all the education we can get, we will not be so narrow as to translate that into narrow specialization, only. We will follow his example and writings and get a broad education, as well. For more on his example, read STANDING FOR SOMETHING. Hinckley has a Liberal Education, and much of it was nurtured by parental example and in the library of his childhood home. As a result of doing the same, we will be better equipped to solve the challenges before us, and not repeat the mistakes of the past.
Here is the preface of the book…
” This first Reading Plan is called A General Introduction to the Great Books and to a Liberal Education.
What is Liberal Education? It is easy to say what it is not. It is not specialized education, not vocational, avocational, professional, or preprofessional. It is not an education that teaches a man how to do any specific thing.
I am tempted to say that it is an education that no American gets in an educational institution nowadays. We are all specialist now. Even early in high school we are told that we must begin to think how we are going to earn a living, and the prerequisites
that are supposed to prepare us for that activity become more and more ingredients of our educational diet. I am afraid that we shall have to admit that the educational process in America is either a rather pleasant way of passing time until we are ready to work, or a way of getting ready for some occupation, or a combination of the two. What is missing is an education to be human beings, education to make the most of our human powers, education for our responsibilities as members of a democratic society, education for freedom.
This is what Liberal Education is. It is the education that prepares you to be free men. You have to have this education if you are going to be happy; for happiness consists in making the most of yourself. You have to have this education if you are going to be a member of the community; for membership in the community implies the ability to communicate with others. You have to have this education if you are going to be an effective citizen of democracy;for citizenship requires that you understand the world in which you live and that you do not leave your duties to be performed by others living vicariously and vacuously on their virtue and intelligence. A free society is a society composed of free men. To be free you have to be educated for freedom. This means that you have to think; for the free man is one who thinks for himself. It means that you have to think, for example, about the aims of life and organized society. These are the questions raised by this first reading plan.
Perhaps I should say a little more about communication and community. For every specialist is trained in the jargon of his specialty. The tendency of specialization is that it grows narrower and narrower. The old definition of a specialist as a man who knows more and more about less and less is only too correct. As specialties grow narrower, the field of communication of each specialist narrows, too. He can talk about his specialty and the language of that specialty, but unless he can find another specialist in precisely the same specialty, he must either become tongue-tied or become a dreadful bore, discoursing on the subject he knows about but the members of his audience do not understand, and doing so in a language incomprehensible to them.
And that is not all . On matters of common interest, like the activities of the community, the specialist is cut off from communication. More and more we hear the phrase,’ That is outside my field,’ even though the subject is one that may mean life and death to the commonwealth, like education, automation, inflation, and nuclear energy. The Constitution of the United States does not require that all citizens should be experts in everything. But its major premise, without which the whole democratic structure must collapse, is that people will be informed enough, and interested enough to judge the policies proposed to them by those whom they have chosen, with information, intelligence, and interest, to represent them.
The incentive to reading these books is not the acquisition of formal proofs of education that Americans are accustom to: credits, degrees, certificates, diplomas, etc. The incentive is simply your own desire to become as human as you can , for your own sake, and that of your country. I have no doubt that you will become more ’successful’ in the usual definition of the term, because I can not believe that it can be a handicap to a man to read and think, and understand the tradition in which he lives. But whether or not you make more money and become more popular as a result of trying to acquire a liberal education, I can assure you that you will become a much more satisfactory companion to yourself.
Can you do it? Many people have. The discussion groups conducted by the Great Books Foundation for the last fifteen years have provided inspiration to hundreds of thousands of participants. Today at Aspen, Colorado, and in many business corporations numerous Americans have accepted seriously the obligation to understand the tradition of the Western world, through these books.
Can you do it yourself? The purpose of this reading plan is to help you overcome your natural diffidence of any modest person in facing so impressive a collection as this set of books. You will see that the problems they deal with are current today. You will observe that the language is not nearly so difficult as you may have been told it is. The ideas are important; but they are not ideas that you have never heard of or have never thought about. These books were not written for specialist in philosophy or political science, or literature; they were written for ordinary people, and read by them until it became fashionable to say, as it has become lately, that they are too difficult for ordinary people.
These books are teachers. They demand attention, but if attention is given, they reward it. As you read on, you will find the reading easier, for one book leads to another.
These books are, I believe the finest written creations of the human mind. Our educational system largely disregards them. Even the names of some of the authors in this set, are never mentioned in the presence of college students today. Yet these are the books that have made the world in which we live, and it is impossible to understand that world without understanding the principle positions taken in them.
A great adventure lies ahead for you as you take part in the Great Conversation.
“” Robert M. Hutchins
What are the 15 works he considered vital that Mortimer Adler and Peter Wolff included in the book? I will post the list to my Called to Liber blog.